VibrantVictoria.caVibrantVictoria: 2012 Winners of West Coast Social Media Awards' Community Builder Award


Welcome to VibrantVictoria.ca Construction Projects List Articles VibrantVictoria on Facebook VibrantVictoria on Twitter Register on VibrantVictoria's forum

Go Back   VibrantVictoria.ca Discussion Forum > Victoria Construction and Land Development > City of Victoria
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

    The Jukebox | 8-storeys | Residential

Construction Projects List Entry

Map of location

Aerial photo of location


Reply
 
Thread Link Options Thread Tools Display Modes
  #151  
Old May 11, 2011, 07:30 AM
jklymak's Avatar  
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Downtown
Posts: 2,454
Default

^ I agree that commercial on View is a tough sell.
Reply With Quote
  #152  
Old May 11, 2011, 02:05 PM
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 590
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jklymak View Post
^ I agree that commercial on View is a tough sell.
And there have been some vacancies on Fort Street as well due to various factors (antique business downturn, etc.).

But there may be a decent chance of successful retail @ the Jukebox if the spaces are leased to "neighbourhood" shops such as a dry cleaner and a convenience store. Downtown's antique dealers & clothing retailers rely on the entire region for support, but neighbourhood retail can succeed with a much smaller pool of customers.

And the 1000 block of View Street is about to become one of the most densely populated residential blocks in all of Victoria (with Jukebox, Regents Park, and Tara Place apartments).
Reply With Quote
  #153  
Old May 11, 2011, 08:32 PM
jklymak's Avatar  
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Downtown
Posts: 2,454
Default

Sure, but fort and yates are so commercial already that it doesn't make sense to try to make view be commercial as well.
Reply With Quote
  #154  
Old May 12, 2011, 09:40 PM
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 22
Default

Its getting closer, but no. I should have four persepctives soon which i will send to Rob. Its deceiving, the exterior is actually a very contemporary aluminum panel sysetm painted in metalic colours, will look much better than any of the renderings IMHO.


Quote:
Originally Posted by aastra View Post
So does this image represent the final product?
http://www.timescolonist.com/4124584.bin?size=620x400

This building in Portland made me think of the View Street proposal:
http://hoytliving.com/slideshows/bui...Bridgeport.jpg
Reply With Quote
  #155  
Old May 12, 2011, 09:46 PM
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 22
Default

Its not so much a mistake as a city requirement, in order to obtain the density to make the project feasible the setbacks had to be at the minimum, the only way this was achievable was to make the View street ground floor units commercial. The consensus is that it makes no sense as straight commercial, but that it would be more prudent to zone these units as 'live work' allowing the smaller home based businesses on the lower of what will be two storey units.

Quote:
Originally Posted by gumgum View Post
I think the commercial is a big mistake. Just look at the View St side of the London Drugs building. If it weren't for the liqour store,'it would be a dead zone - and that's a more populated area.
Reply With Quote
  #156  
Old May 13, 2011, 11:17 AM
Mike K.'s Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Vic West
Posts: 12,085
Default

AH, that makes a lot of sense, Islander. Thanks for the heads up!
__________________
Skyscraper Source Media Inc.
Reply With Quote
  #157  
Old May 13, 2011, 02:34 PM
MarkoJ's Avatar  
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Downtown
Posts: 1,099
Default

Does anyone know what the average unit size is going to be? Foot print is big but still 25 units/floor.
__________________
Marko Juras, REALTOR® & Associate Broker | Fair Realty
www.MarkoJuras.com - Gold MLS® Winner | www.FlatFeeListVictoria.com - List on MLS® for $799 | www.834sales.com - The 834 Specialist
Reply With Quote
  #158  
Old May 25, 2011, 12:35 PM
Dylan Leblanc's Avatar
Custom User Title
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Downtown
Posts: 2,890
Default

Found this pic here - http://www.campbellconstruction.ca/G...on/uconst.html

Reply With Quote
  #159  
Old May 31, 2011, 12:30 PM
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 817
Default

The ugly salmon coloured building to the east of the Jukebox site has scaffolding all the way up on the east and south sides. Perhaps that building is being remediated? Hopefully they choose a difference colour.
Reply With Quote
  #160  
Old Jul 12, 2011, 11:14 AM
Mike K.'s Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Vic West
Posts: 12,085
Default

I ran into one of the partners involved with this project and was told that construction could begin as early as August.
__________________
Skyscraper Source Media Inc.
Reply With Quote
  #161  
Old Jul 12, 2011, 12:34 PM
MarkoJ's Avatar  
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Downtown
Posts: 1,099
Default

No pre-sales required to get this one going?
__________________
Marko Juras, REALTOR® & Associate Broker | Fair Realty
www.MarkoJuras.com - Gold MLS® Winner | www.FlatFeeListVictoria.com - List on MLS® for $799 | www.834sales.com - The 834 Specialist
Reply With Quote
  #162  
Old Jul 12, 2011, 09:40 PM
Rob Randall's Avatar  
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Gordon Head
Posts: 2,456
Default

^When Fraser and Don did the Mosaic they didn't start sales until renovations were well under way.
__________________
Robert Randall's blog
Reply With Quote
  #163  
Old Sep 13, 2011, 12:43 PM
Dylan Leblanc's Avatar
Custom User Title
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Downtown
Posts: 2,890
Default

Reply With Quote
  #164  
Old Sep 13, 2011, 12:54 PM
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 590
Default

The lot has been fenced for some time now; I wonder when work will begin on the Jukebox? Is it possible that the additional competition in the entry-level segment of the market (i.e. Era, Mondrian) is giving pause to the developers...?
Reply With Quote
  #165  
Old Sep 20, 2011, 08:10 AM
Mike K.'s Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Vic West
Posts: 12,085
Default

Jukebox was to be the first project to hit the market and built ahead of the others, according to the developers initial plans. The marketing component of the project was in the works early in the year but so far nothing has been released for public consumption but the developer does insist the project is still on track.

But right now if the developers were to move on Jukebox they'd be facing competition from five major projects (Mondrian, Era, Promontory, Hudson and Union) and several smaller ones (601 Herald, Kunju, LeFevre's renos, etc.).
__________________
Skyscraper Source Media Inc.
Reply With Quote
  #166  
Old Sep 20, 2011, 08:14 AM
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 133
Default

The failed Bear Mountain tower The Highlander was a project by the same people behind Jukebox I think. The Highlander is still sitting atop the hill with only several floors of poured concrete among single family dwellings.
Reply With Quote
  #167  
Old Sep 20, 2011, 07:26 PM
LJ LJ is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Langford
Posts: 2,971
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VicBooster View Post
The Highlander is still sitting atop the hill with only several floors of poured concrete among single family dwellings.
Actually, there is another condo right next door to it.
__________________
Life's a journey......so roll down the window and enjoy the breeze.
Reply With Quote
  #168  
Old Sep 21, 2011, 07:16 AM
Mike K.'s Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Vic West
Posts: 12,085
Default

And that changes the Highlander's impact on the neighbourhood? The little condo is higher up atop the hill and Highlander has barely even reached it's first floor. In any case, the situation is illustrated quite well here. I'd be furious if I bought into one of those homes, but that's just me.
__________________
Skyscraper Source Media Inc.
Reply With Quote
  #169  
Old Sep 21, 2011, 07:29 AM
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 8,805
Default

It would look pretty good if it could be finished with just another couple of stories on it.
Reply With Quote
  #170  
Old Sep 21, 2011, 10:59 AM
LJ LJ is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Langford
Posts: 2,971
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike K. View Post
And that changes the Highlander's impact on the neighbourhood? The little condo is higher up atop the hill and Highlander has barely even reached it's first floor. In any case, the situation is illustrated quite well here. I'd be furious if I bought into one of those homes, but that's just me.
I didn't say it changed anything, I just corrected a statement made by vicbooster.

All the people that built houses there knew what was proposed for the adjoining sites and thus paid appropriately for their lots.

You're not secretly "knot-a-yacht" are you???
__________________
Life's a journey......so roll down the window and enjoy the breeze.
Reply With Quote
  #171  
Old Sep 21, 2011, 11:06 AM
Mike K.'s Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Vic West
Posts: 12,085
Default

Quote:
All the people that built houses there knew what was proposed for the adjoining sites and thus paid appropriately for their lots.
Buying a house next to a proposed 14-storey condo and ending up a neighbour of a four storey concrete shell are two very different things All I'm saying is I'd be less than enthused with a half finished building being the centerpiece of my neighbourhood.
__________________
Skyscraper Source Media Inc.
Reply With Quote
  #172  
Old Sep 21, 2011, 11:29 AM
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 590
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike K. View Post
Jukebox was to be the first project to hit the market and built ahead of the others, according to the developers initial plans. The marketing component of the project was in the works early in the year but so far nothing has been released for public consumption but the developer does insist the project is still on track.

But right now if the developers were to move on Jukebox they'd be facing competition from five major projects (Mondrian, Era, Promontory, Hudson and Union) and several smaller ones (601 Herald, Kunju, LeFevre's renos, etc.).
I wonder what amenities will be offered to residents of the Jukebox...? Are there plans to incorporate a residents' lounge or gym?

Given the number of major and minor projects coming onto the market I would think that the developer of the Jukebox would want the project to *stand apart* from the competition. For example, the Mondrian will not offering amenities (aside from a residential caretaker & suite). Maybe, in keeping with the theme, the Jukebox will include a rec room with a vintage jukebox and a dance floor?
Reply With Quote
  #173  
Old Sep 22, 2011, 07:44 PM
LJ LJ is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Langford
Posts: 2,971
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike K. View Post
Buying a house next to a proposed 14-storey condo and ending up a neighbour of a four storey concrete shell are two very different things All I'm saying is I'd be less than enthused with a half finished building being the centerpiece of my neighbourhood.
Well they didn't give any timelines I guess. It will be built eventually but it wont be 14 stories.

Think of it this way, the people in their SFD's beside it have got a reprieve from the noise and traffic from all those extra neighbours for awhile.
__________________
Life's a journey......so roll down the window and enjoy the breeze.
Reply With Quote
  #174  
Old Sep 29, 2011, 09:22 AM
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 22
Default

Not quite correct, only one partner was involved and he pulled out before the project stalled.

Quote:
Originally Posted by VicBooster View Post
The Highlander was a project by the same people behind Jukebox I think.
Reply With Quote
  #175  
Old Sep 29, 2011, 09:26 AM
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 22
Default

Site work is scheduled to start next week, the piling permit is approved however there are several MOE requirements to comply with first, and that was partially responsible for the delays (test results had to be received before a plan could be formulated)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kapten Kapsell View Post
The lot has been fenced for some time now; I wonder when work will begin on the Jukebox? Is it possible that the additional competition in the entry-level segment of the market (i.e. Era, Mondrian) is giving pause to the developers...?
Reply With Quote
You're not quite at the end of this discussion thread!

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page and read additional posts.
 

Reply

Go Back   VibrantVictoria.ca Discussion Forum > Victoria Construction and Land Development > City of Victoria



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
© Copyright 2006 - 2012, Skyscraper Source Media Inc.