VibrantVictoria.caVibrantVictoria: 2012 Winners of West Coast Social Media Awards' Community Builder Award


Welcome to VibrantVictoria.ca Construction Projects List Articles VibrantVictoria on Facebook VibrantVictoria on Twitter Register on VibrantVictoria's forum

Go Back   VibrantVictoria.ca Discussion Forum > Victoria Construction and Land Development > City of Victoria
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

    The Mondrian | 10-storeys; 30m | Residential, commercial

Construction Projects List Entry

Map of location

Aerial photo of location

You are viewing the first (oldest) page of this thread.  Use the page navigation links to the lower-right to go to the most recent discussions about this building.
    


Like Tree4Likes

Reply
 
Thread Link Options Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old Dec 22, 2010, 11:30 PM
Rob Randall's Avatar  
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Gordon Head
Posts: 2,455
Under Construction Building [Downtown Victoria] The Mondrian | Condos | 10 storeys | U/C

Cook/Johnson condo project tries again

By Robert Randall • Published on Thursday, December 23, 2010

Quote:
Proponents of a new condo building at the northwest corner of the Cook Street and Johnson Street intersection are hoping the third time’s a charm when a new design goes before city council in the new year.

The new owner is teaming up with architectural firm deHoog & Kierulf to present a fresh design for the site, the third since the lot at 1048 Johnson was targeted for redevelopment four years ago.
more...
__________________
Robert Randall's blog

Last edited by Rob Randall; Dec 23, 2010 at 12:01 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old Dec 23, 2010, 06:35 AM
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Rockland
Posts: 3,223
Default

5:1 density!! Me likey!
__________________
"beats greezy have baked donut-dough"
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old Dec 23, 2010, 06:53 AM
G-Man's Avatar
Senior Case Officer
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: A hop, skip and a jump from Downtown.
Posts: 9,199
Default

Sounds good to me. I do remain a little concerned about the lot next door. But perhaps a SoMA type building could go in there.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old Dec 23, 2010, 08:33 AM
Dylan Leblanc's Avatar
Custom User Title
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Downtown
Posts: 2,879
Default

I hope a "podium tower" isn't a bad thing. The previous design was perfect.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old Dec 23, 2010, 08:45 AM
Mike K.'s Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Vic West
Posts: 12,055
Default

The original proposal looked like this:

__________________
Skyscraper Source Media Inc.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old Dec 23, 2010, 08:53 AM
Hotel Mike's Avatar
Hotel Mike
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: James Bay
Posts: 509
Default

Wow. That might really pick up that area. Then there's the huge lot on the other side of Cook next to the medical centre. I wonder if this would be a catalyst for more happening there.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old Dec 23, 2010, 09:27 AM
gumgum's Avatar  
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Cook St. Village
Posts: 5,884
Default

Fingers crossed!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old Dec 23, 2010, 11:53 AM
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 8,800
Default

Why do they always seem to want to go back to the drawing board? The original renderings looked really good.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old Dec 23, 2010, 11:58 AM
gumgum's Avatar  
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Cook St. Village
Posts: 5,884
Default

^The previous design was an office. I don't think the previous entity would make a decent condo.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old Dec 23, 2010, 12:12 PM
Rob Randall's Avatar  
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Gordon Head
Posts: 2,455
Default

I don't remember an office component.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike K. View Post
The original proposal looked like this:

To clarify, that is the second version. I don't have an image of the very first one circa 2005 but it was quite different. I believe both versions were modified after much feedback, including Design Panel recommendations so it wouldn't surprise me if there were a half dozen iterations floating around. That photo depicts Kwan's design that resulted after people said the building should be more modern and broken up and with a corner entrance. I think Corazon and Juliet may have influenced it as the renderings for those popular buildings may have been around at the time.

Harris Green guidelines recommend staggered setbacks to encourage a terraced look to towers but developers and architects prefer straight-sided buildings for various reasons. De Hoog will propose a straight-sided tower pulled back from the podium that will satisfy the setback requirements.
__________________
Robert Randall's blog

Last edited by Rob Randall; Dec 23, 2010 at 12:18 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old Dec 23, 2010, 12:16 PM
Rob Randall's Avatar  
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Gordon Head
Posts: 2,455
Default

This is what I've heard from developers and architects on why they dislike setback rules designed to create terraced towers.
  1. They dislike the ziggurat look
  2. More deck area exposed to the elements (waterproofing concerns)
  3. Different sized floorplates make design and construction expensive
__________________
Robert Randall's blog
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old Dec 23, 2010, 12:23 PM
gumgum's Avatar  
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Cook St. Village
Posts: 5,884
Default

I could have sworn this was originally office.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old Dec 23, 2010, 12:34 PM
Dylan Leblanc's Avatar
Custom User Title
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Downtown
Posts: 2,879
Default

No that was residential. The developer may want to update the design of the building though to better reflect what type of units and price point the current market demands.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old Dec 23, 2010, 04:48 PM
amor de cosmos's Avatar
YIMBY
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,893
Default

what if the cook st village went all the way to RAP? :dancingbanana:
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old Dec 23, 2010, 10:09 PM
G-Man's Avatar
Senior Case Officer
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: A hop, skip and a jump from Downtown.
Posts: 9,199
Default

Well North of Pandora it would stop because that is North Park Village.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old Dec 24, 2010, 08:32 AM
amor de cosmos's Avatar
YIMBY
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,893
Default

really? I didn't know it had a name
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old Dec 24, 2010, 01:00 PM
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Probably at home.
Posts: 1,238
Default

I'm still trying to figure out why the original design was nixed.
__________________
In chains by Keynes
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old Dec 24, 2010, 01:44 PM
jklymak's Avatar  
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Downtown
Posts: 2,454
Default

^ It wasn't - it just didn't get built because of the economy.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old Dec 25, 2010, 01:10 PM
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Oak Bay
Posts: 970
Default

As I recall Fred Rohani and company bought the property. He built the Aria and many other projects in town. His dad built the tower at 747 Fort St
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old Dec 25, 2010, 04:36 PM
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 590
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by concorde View Post
As I recall Fred Rohani and company bought the property. He built the Aria and many other projects in town. His dad built the tower at 747 Fort St
A condo sales centre is going into the vacant storefront of the Aria (next to Armeni Jewelers); the original plans to lease the space to a nail/tanning salon fell through.

If Alpha Developments is planning to build the proposed tower at Cook/Johnson then it is highly likely that the condo sales centre under construction at the Aria is associated with this new project.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old Dec 25, 2010, 04:40 PM
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 590
Smile

OK- it looks like the project will be called The Mondrian and its address will actually by 1090 Johnson Street.

Alpha Developments has announced the project on its website:
http://www.alphadevelopments.com/newprojects.html
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old Dec 25, 2010, 09:40 PM
amor de cosmos's Avatar
YIMBY
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,893
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BCguy75 View Post
OK- it looks like the project will be called The Mondrian
like this painting? that would be slick maybe the bright colours wouldn't work so well in victoria though


Last edited by amor de cosmos; Dec 25, 2010 at 09:45 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old Dec 26, 2010, 02:34 PM
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Probably at home.
Posts: 1,238
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jklymak View Post
^ It wasn't - it just didn't get built because of the economy.
That makes sense now, thanks.

Doesn't Harris Green have higher height limits than 10 stories though? I mean there's View Towers, The Manhattan, Regent Park, etc....
__________________
In chains by Keynes
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old Dec 26, 2010, 09:51 PM
Rob Randall's Avatar  
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Gordon Head
Posts: 2,455
Default

^I believe those all came in before the current guidelines (+ - 10 years ago.)

The Manhattan, for example was allowed to build that high because density transfer and a covenant was placed on the neighbouring two-storey office tower. Recall this prevented what would have been the 7-Eleven tower at Quadra/Yates.

The Regent's Park tower was allowed because they built that huge semi-public garden space connecting View with Yates.

The history of View Towers can be found elsewhere in this forum.
__________________
Robert Randall's blog
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old Dec 26, 2010, 10:05 PM
jklymak's Avatar  
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Downtown
Posts: 2,454
Default

^ Aren't the new guidelines for much taller buildings? Why don't the developers push for that?
Reply With Quote
You're not quite at the end of this discussion thread!

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page and read additional posts.
 

Reply

Go Back   VibrantVictoria.ca Discussion Forum > Victoria Construction and Land Development > City of Victoria



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
© Copyright 2006 - 2012, Skyscraper Source Media Inc.