![]() ![]() | ![]() |
| | |
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
| | Thread Link Options | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
|
The Well. I guess Caledonia starts after Douglas street, for some reason I always thought it was Chatham up until Blanshard, then Caledonia. A quick check of Sopranos website does indeed confirm that the block is Caledonia. I hope we don't end up referring to this as the "Oh Well". There is great potential in this site, the mix of residential, retail, office, recreational and parking space is exciting, but thus far the actual design of the buildings leaves a little to be desired. Vic News article: Quote:
![]() |
|
#2
| ||||
| ||||
|
Since the Y is apparently balking at relocating, that pool pavillion will be replaced--probably by an amphitheatre. There's quite a dramatic slope to the site--an opportunity for some interesting public space. The initial concept sketch for the northeast corner:
__________________ "Beaver, ahoy!" "The bridge is like a magnet, attracting both pedestrians and over 30,000 vehicles daily who enjoy the views of Victoria's harbour. The skyline may change, but "Big Blue" as some call it, will always be there." -City of Victoria website, 2009 Last edited by Holden West; Nov 06, 2007 at 09:00 AM. |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
|
and here's some great pics of the site currently courtesy Scaper: ![]() ![]() ![]() I ride my bike up that street on my way home everday...can't wait for that field across from the Jack Davis building to be gone! Plus I'm sure those ugly telephone poles will be replaced with underground wiring and the sidewalk improved on that stretch, so that's another bonus! |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
|
Thanks Zoomer!!! :wink:
|
|
#5
| ||||
| ||||
|
Whoa, thanks for those photos, Scaper! It'll be a shame to lose such a pristene patch of open space 8)
__________________ Skyscraper Source Media Inc.
|
|
#6
| |||
| |||
|
Talking about open spaces, this proposal doesn't have any. This is what Pam's great Vission has created. Developers who are too scared to put the money and time in to fight for what's better. So here you have it. A proposal that's right up to the height limit and a Massive Wall. I nick name it the WALL This is a serious mistake. I would like to see more height and more open space/green space. Oh and guessed who voted against it at the COTW??? You guessed it the anti Green Sonya, and her Older Twin PAM! |
|
#7
| ||||
| ||||
|
I am going to admit that apart from wanting the middle res building squeezed a bit to be made a couple of stories taller, I like this proposal. I think that it is dynamic and will completely change that part of town. The only thing I am worried about is the amphitheatre. I think they would be better off and so would the city if they built a really funky square or park. Remember there is going to be residential all around it so it is not like they are going to be having concerts everyday.
__________________ Density Fanboy |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
|
I am looking forwards to seeing something built here. It has so much potential for boostering north of downtown. It also has the same potential for ruining north of downtown, but Im an optimist. I do however think that the name should be changed. The Well? It sounds like a money pit to me, and in Victoria the way things go, it will be. Not very Feng Shui if you ask me. |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
|
A well could also be regarded as something from which good things flow or spring forth. A source of life and abundance.
|
|
#10
| |||
| |||
|
that mid section just wrecks it for me, i really hate the massing there. oddly enough it kinda reminds me of shoal point, i dunno why though. That still doesn't mean i support the project as appearing. |
|
#11
| ||||
| ||||
|
It's called the Well because of an aquifer located below the property. Or so the story goes... Holden? You know whats up wrt that?
__________________ Skyscraper Source Media Inc.
|
|
#12
| ||||
| ||||
|
that was the plan (geothermal heating). They're still working on some of the details including massing. Pam insisted it go to the Advisory Planning Commision even though there's no real re-zoning required.
__________________ "Beaver, ahoy!" "The bridge is like a magnet, attracting both pedestrians and over 30,000 vehicles daily who enjoy the views of Victoria's harbour. The skyline may change, but "Big Blue" as some call it, will always be there." -City of Victoria website, 2009 |
|
#13
| ||||
| ||||
|
Why? So they can be told the building is too Vancouver-like and will destroy Victoria? The ADP is a poor excuse of a NIMBY panel the way its run at-present.
__________________ Skyscraper Source Media Inc.
|
|
#14
| |||
| |||
|
Tooooooo WIDE!!!!!!! It needs 2 B Code: ____ | /\ | | | /__\ | | | / \ |__ |___ |
|
#15
| ||||
| ||||
|
They're not looking for rezoning, so if you're looking for for them to build a height limit-breaking highrise... ...in the words of LBJ: "That dog won't hunt."
__________________ "Beaver, ahoy!" "The bridge is like a magnet, attracting both pedestrians and over 30,000 vehicles daily who enjoy the views of Victoria's harbour. The skyline may change, but "Big Blue" as some call it, will always be there." -City of Victoria website, 2009 |
|
#16
| |||
| |||
|
Yeah I know. I am just having fun, but I do think they need to add some height to slim down the towers. It would also be really nice if they could continue that carriage way, that Townline is proposing right through to the next block. I really really think that would connect the two developments together. The only way they could do this is by creating a taller residential tower and breaking up the width. |
|
#17
| ||||
| ||||
|
I think it's really cool how the old bay carriageway is going end at the Well's public space. Look how two developers can co-operate and end up providing something really cool, it doesn't seem like ad-hoc planning to me as a certian councilor has stated.
__________________ Past President of Victoria's Flâneur Union Local 1862 |
|
#18
| |||
| |||
|
There is definately co ordination between the two developments for sure. I just wish in my mind that the carriage way would continue another block and that the next development could take over from that. I don't want this development sealing off what could be the border for downtown development. It would be better if it was developed in away to encourage development on the next block northward. My thoughts anyways. :-D |
|
#19
| ||||
| ||||
|
^Good point, I guess it would be a wall. If it went through it would end at Soprano's!!! VHF would like that!
__________________ Past President of Victoria's Flâneur Union Local 1862 |
|
#20
| ||||
| ||||
|
So what's the deal with this project? Are they adding several storeys to both towers and slimming the profile of the buildings? The original concept was straight out of the fatrscraper book or architecture, thanks in part by the restrictive regulations of Victoria's outdated downtown plan.
__________________ Skyscraper Source Media Inc.
|
|
#21
| |||
| |||
|
The latest word I have is that they want to add two stories onto the original proposal to slim up the latest rendering. this was done as some V.V. members spoke out at the APC meeting and made a good impression.....or this would be heading to public hearing without the changes being made. :-D |
|
#22
| |||
| |||
|
Has anybody managed to see a good rendering of this project?
|
|
#23
| |||
| |||
|
I have a copy of the original, but not the latest one. I can try and see if I can get the latest rendering though.
|
|
#24
| ||||
| ||||
|
There are the old renderings prior to the redesign as per community input atop this page. Nothing new has been released but more info is at http://www.vibrantvictoria.ca/developme ... ellres.htm and http://www.vibrantvictoria.ca/developme ... office.htm
__________________ Skyscraper Source Media Inc.
|
|
#25
| |||
| |||
|
I will also get a copy of those skyline shots of the earlier proposal too. I only have a paper copy. thanks DERF!!! |
| You're not quite at the end of this discussion thread! Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page and read additional posts. |
| | |
![]() |
| « Previous Thread
|
Next Thread » | ||||||
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |