VibrantVictoria.caVibrantVictoria: 2012 Winners of West Coast Social Media Awards' Community Builder Award


Welcome to VibrantVictoria.ca Construction Projects List Articles VibrantVictoria on Facebook VibrantVictoria on Twitter Register on VibrantVictoria's forum

Go Back   VibrantVictoria.ca Discussion Forum > Victoria Construction and Land Development > City of Victoria
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read


Reply
 
Thread Link Options Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old Aug 02, 2006, 10:31 PM
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Victoria - Oaklands
Posts: 779
Canceled Proposal [Downtown Victoria] Radius condo & office | 17- & 13-storeys | Canceled in 2008

The Well.

I guess Caledonia starts after Douglas street, for some reason I always thought it was Chatham up until Blanshard, then Caledonia. A quick check of Sopranos website does indeed confirm that the block is Caledonia.

I hope we don't end up referring to this as the "Oh Well". There is great potential in this site, the mix of residential, retail, office, recreational and parking space is exciting, but thus far the actual design of the buildings leaves a little to be desired.

Vic News article:

Quote:
Planned development signals change

By Brennan Clarke
Victoria News
Jul 28 2006

Density of “The Well” proposal debated; city plan criticized as out of date

The transformation of an entire city block in downtown Victoria moved one step closer to reality after a contentious debate by Victoria city councillors over plans for a massive development known as The Well.

The proposal, including 84 residential units, 17,000 square metres of office space, 300 underground parking spaces, a pub, a fitness facility and a daycare, is slated for the block bordered by Blanshard, Douglas, Caledonia and Herald streets.

In most aspects the plans were well-received, with planning staff noting the proposal “is consistent with” current city policies.

However, some councillors were troubled by the developer’s request for an estimated 60 per cent increase in density on the site.

Coun. Pam Madoff complained that the city’s downtown plan, which addresses building height and density in the downtown core, is more than a decade old and no longer reflects downtown’s needs.

“What we are doing is designing a house one room at a time, and when you do it that way you have no idea what you’re going to end up with,” Madoff said. “I don’t think it’s good enough to say this is one person’s vision. It’s not good enough to plan this city one site at a time,”

Coun. Geoff Young agreed that city policies are falling behind the times but said council can’t stop doing business until city planners complete an update of the downtown plan.

“Tabling (the application) for two years is not feasible. Tabling it for two weeks will do no good,” Young observed.

Despite the extra density, none of the buildings proposed for The Well exceed the city’s 43-metre height limit.

Yet The Well, coupled with a trio of over-height highrises planned for the former Hudson’s Bay Company lot across the street, heralds a major makeover of the city’s North End.

Coun. Sonya Chandler said the success or failure of those changes will be largely governed by the effectiveness of city policies.

“This is the beginning of some really big changes in our downtown,” Chandler said. “The more work we do up front, the more likely it is we’re going to be happy with the results.”

Peter Laughlin of Wessex Project Management, the company handling the application on behalf of Ontario-based Principal Holdings Inc., said the density issue needs to be considered in the context of all the public amenities that have been included in the project.

“It’s about creating a comprehensive development project,” Laughlin said. “We recognize the city is at a crossroads and we feel the density we’re asking for is justified by the amenity package we’re proposing.”

According to the application package submitted to council last week, those amenities include public open space, a mid-block walkway, $30,000 worth of public art, 400 underground parking spaces, “demonstrable benefit” in revitalizing Victoria’s North End and an affordable housing contribution of $1,000 per dwelling unit.

Laughlin said another benefit of The Well will be the vast amount of new office space, something few developers in Victoria have attempted in recent years.

Initially plans called for the YW-YMCA to move into The Well, but “Y” officials said last week they have decided to opt out. However the project will include a substantial health and wellness centre.

Laughlin said the area slated for a new pool for the YM-YWCA may be turned into an amphitheatre instead.

The Jack Davis building, at the corner of Herald and Blanshard streets, is not part of the proposal. Neither is a series of lowrise storefronts at the corner of Caledonia and Douglas streets that includes a small grocery store and a Red Hot Video outlet.

Robert Randall, head of the Downtown Residents Association said the project is a welcome bit of revitalization.

“It’s going to take density to bring downtown alive again and that’s where the density has to go,” Randall said, noting that the Douglas Street side of the property is home to an adult movie store.

“I’ve yet to meet anyone who says ‘let’s keep that Red Hot Video vibe alive.’”

The North Park Neighbourhood Association and the Burnside-Gorge Neighbourhood Association have also lent their seal of approval to the project.

Thursday’s debate ended with council voting to send the proposal to a public hearing.


Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old Aug 02, 2006, 10:39 PM
Holden West's Avatar
Va va voom!
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Please stand by
Posts: 7,852
Default

Since the Y is apparently balking at relocating, that pool pavillion will be replaced--probably by an amphitheatre. There's quite a dramatic slope to the site--an opportunity for some interesting public space.

The initial concept sketch for the northeast corner:

__________________
"Beaver, ahoy!"
"The bridge is like a magnet, attracting both pedestrians and over 30,000 vehicles daily who enjoy the views of Victoria's harbour. The skyline may change, but "Big Blue" as some call it, will always be there."
-City of Victoria website, 2009

Last edited by Holden West; Nov 06, 2007 at 09:00 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old Aug 02, 2006, 10:45 PM
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Victoria - Oaklands
Posts: 779
Default

and here's some great pics of the site currently courtesy Scaper:







I ride my bike up that street on my way home everday...can't wait for that field across from the Jack Davis building to be gone! Plus I'm sure those ugly telephone poles will be replaced with underground wiring and the sidewalk improved on that stretch, so that's another bonus!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old Aug 02, 2006, 10:47 PM
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: CRD LAND
Posts: 1,262
Default

Thanks Zoomer!!! :wink:
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old Aug 02, 2006, 10:51 PM
Mike K.'s Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Vic West
Posts: 12,072
Default

Whoa, thanks for those photos, Scaper!

It'll be a shame to lose such a pristene patch of open space 8)
__________________
Skyscraper Source Media Inc.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old Aug 02, 2006, 10:55 PM
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: CRD LAND
Posts: 1,262
Default

Talking about open spaces, this proposal doesn't have any. This is what Pam's great Vission has created. Developers who are too scared to put the money and time in to fight for what's better. So here you have it. A proposal that's right up to the height limit and a Massive Wall.

I nick name it the WALL

This is a serious mistake. I would like to see more height and more open space/green space.

Oh and guessed who voted against it at the COTW???

You guessed it the anti Green Sonya, and her Older Twin PAM!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old Aug 03, 2006, 06:26 AM
G-Man's Avatar
Senior Case Officer
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: A hop, skip and a jump from Downtown.
Posts: 9,204
Default

I am going to admit that apart from wanting the middle res building squeezed a bit to be made a couple of stories taller, I like this proposal. I think that it is dynamic and will completely change that part of town. The only thing I am worried about is the amphitheatre. I think they would be better off and so would the city if they built a really funky square or park. Remember there is going to be residential all around it so it is not like they are going to be having concerts everyday.
__________________
Density Fanboy
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old Aug 03, 2006, 08:39 AM
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Vancouver, from Victoria
Posts: 383
Default

I am looking forwards to seeing something built here. It has so much potential for boostering north of downtown. It also has the same potential for ruining north of downtown, but Im an optimist.

I do however think that the name should be changed. The Well? It sounds like a money pit to me, and in Victoria the way things go, it will be. Not very Feng Shui if you ask me.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old Aug 03, 2006, 10:41 AM
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 8,804
Default

A well could also be regarded as something from which good things flow or spring forth. A source of life and abundance.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old Aug 03, 2006, 02:17 PM
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 58
Default

that mid section just wrecks it for me, i really hate the massing there.

oddly enough it kinda reminds me of shoal point, i dunno why though. That still doesn't mean i support the project as appearing.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old Aug 03, 2006, 05:19 PM
Mike K.'s Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Vic West
Posts: 12,072
Default

It's called the Well because of an aquifer located below the property. Or so the story goes...

Holden? You know whats up wrt that?
__________________
Skyscraper Source Media Inc.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old Aug 03, 2006, 05:22 PM
Holden West's Avatar
Va va voom!
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Please stand by
Posts: 7,852
Default

that was the plan (geothermal heating).

They're still working on some of the details including massing. Pam insisted it go to the Advisory Planning Commision even though there's no real re-zoning required.
__________________
"Beaver, ahoy!"
"The bridge is like a magnet, attracting both pedestrians and over 30,000 vehicles daily who enjoy the views of Victoria's harbour. The skyline may change, but "Big Blue" as some call it, will always be there."
-City of Victoria website, 2009
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old Aug 03, 2006, 05:24 PM
Mike K.'s Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Vic West
Posts: 12,072
Default

Why? So they can be told the building is too Vancouver-like and will destroy Victoria?

The ADP is a poor excuse of a NIMBY panel the way its run at-present.
__________________
Skyscraper Source Media Inc.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old Aug 03, 2006, 05:26 PM
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: CRD LAND
Posts: 1,262
Default

Tooooooo WIDE!!!!!!! It needs 2 B

Code:
  ____                   
   |        /\    |    |
   |       /__\   |    |
   |      /    \  |__  |___
and SLIM!!!
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old Aug 03, 2006, 05:32 PM
Holden West's Avatar
Va va voom!
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Please stand by
Posts: 7,852
Default

They're not looking for rezoning, so if you're looking for for them to build a height limit-breaking highrise...

...in the words of LBJ:

"That dog won't hunt."
__________________
"Beaver, ahoy!"
"The bridge is like a magnet, attracting both pedestrians and over 30,000 vehicles daily who enjoy the views of Victoria's harbour. The skyline may change, but "Big Blue" as some call it, will always be there."
-City of Victoria website, 2009
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old Aug 03, 2006, 05:48 PM
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: CRD LAND
Posts: 1,262
Default

Yeah I know. I am just having fun, but I do think they need to add some height to slim down the towers.

It would also be really nice if they could continue that carriage way, that Townline is proposing right through to the next block. I really really think that would connect the two developments together. The only way they could do this is by creating a taller residential tower and breaking up the width.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old Aug 03, 2006, 05:56 PM
Galvanized's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,196
Default

I think it's really cool how the old bay carriageway is going end at the Well's public space. Look how two developers can co-operate and end up providing something really cool, it doesn't seem like ad-hoc planning to me as a certian councilor has stated.
__________________
Past President of Victoria's Flâneur Union Local 1862
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old Aug 03, 2006, 06:15 PM
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: CRD LAND
Posts: 1,262
Default

There is definately co ordination between the two developments for sure. I just wish in my mind that the carriage way would continue another block and that the next development could take over from that. I don't want this development sealing off what could be the border for downtown development. It would be better if it was developed in away to encourage development on the next block northward.

My thoughts anyways. :-D
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old Aug 03, 2006, 06:47 PM
Galvanized's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,196
Default

^Good point, I guess it would be a wall. If it went through it would end at Soprano's!!! VHF would like that!
__________________
Past President of Victoria's Flâneur Union Local 1862
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old Oct 16, 2006, 04:37 PM
Mike K.'s Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Vic West
Posts: 12,072
Default

So what's the deal with this project? Are they adding several storeys to both towers and slimming the profile of the buildings?

The original concept was straight out of the fatrscraper book or architecture, thanks in part by the restrictive regulations of Victoria's outdated downtown plan.
__________________
Skyscraper Source Media Inc.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old Oct 16, 2006, 07:13 PM
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: CRD LAND
Posts: 1,262
Default

The latest word I have is that they want to add two stories onto the original proposal to slim up the latest rendering.

this was done as some V.V. members spoke out at the APC meeting and made a good impression.....or this would be heading to public hearing without the changes being made. :-D
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old Oct 16, 2006, 07:14 PM
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 8,804
Default

Has anybody managed to see a good rendering of this project?
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old Oct 16, 2006, 07:47 PM
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: CRD LAND
Posts: 1,262
Default

I have a copy of the original, but not the latest one. I can try and see if I can get the latest rendering though.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old Oct 16, 2006, 07:49 PM
Mike K.'s Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Vic West
Posts: 12,072
Default

There are the old renderings prior to the redesign as per community input atop this page.

Nothing new has been released but more info is at
http://www.vibrantvictoria.ca/developme ... ellres.htm

and

http://www.vibrantvictoria.ca/developme ... office.htm
__________________
Skyscraper Source Media Inc.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old Oct 16, 2006, 07:51 PM
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: CRD LAND
Posts: 1,262
Default

I will also get a copy of those skyline shots of the earlier proposal too. I only have a paper copy.

thanks DERF!!!
Reply With Quote
You're not quite at the end of this discussion thread!

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page and read additional posts.
 

Reply

Go Back   VibrantVictoria.ca Discussion Forum > Victoria Construction and Land Development > City of Victoria



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:42 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
© Copyright 2006 - 2012, Skyscraper Source Media Inc.