VibrantVictoria.caVibrantVictoria: 2012 Winners of West Coast Social Media Awards' Community Builder Award


Welcome to VibrantVictoria.ca Construction Projects List Articles VibrantVictoria on Facebook VibrantVictoria on Twitter Register on VibrantVictoria's forum

Go Back   VibrantVictoria.ca Discussion Forum > Victoria Construction and Land Development > City of Victoria
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

    Union | Condo | 5- & 5-storeys

Construction Projects List Entry

Map of location

Aerial photo of location


Like Tree3Likes

Reply
 
Thread Link Options Thread Tools Display Modes
  #226  
Old May 30, 2012, 07:00 PM
MarkoJ's Avatar  
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Downtown
Posts: 1,127
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Acorn View Post
Anybody know where they are dumping what they truck out of the site? I suppose some has been barged away in the past (Bamboo?) - but to where? What do companies do with contaminated earth, like this lot supposedly has? Filter it? (probably too costly, if even possible) or just bury it again somewhere else?
Do you have proof that it is contaminated? If not I think your comment is defamatory of this project.
__________________
Marko Juras, REALTOR® & Associate Broker | Fair Realty
www.MarkoJuras.com - Gold MLS® Winner | www.FlatFeeListVictoria.com - List on MLS® for $799 | www.834sales.com - The 834 Specialist
Reply With Quote
  #227  
Old May 30, 2012, 07:10 PM
UrbanRail's Avatar
Transit user
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Victoria (Saanich)
Posts: 1,524
Default

I dont see how this would be contaminated. Didnt this use to be the old Buckerfields site? Besides if it werent safe, I doubt the developer would start construction, so I am pretty sure its fine. I did see the website, and the floorplans look pretty generous. Anyone know how much these condos are going for? I couldnt find a price.
__________________
Aaron

Promoting the return of the streetcar in modern form to Victoria and the use of the E&N as a commuter rail link on Vancouver Island.

Member of the E&N Division of the Canadian Railroad Historical Association
Camosun College Student, Amateur Artist, Transit and Rail Advocate,
Currently working on a documentary film to promote the E&N Rwy

Follow me on Twitter; http://twitter.com/IslandRail
Commuter Rail Facebook Group; http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=139261686101247

Last edited by UrbanRail; May 30, 2012 at 07:15 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #228  
Old May 30, 2012, 09:07 PM
G-Man's Avatar
Senior Case Officer
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: A hop, skip and a jump from Downtown.
Posts: 9,235
Default

Yes I think it is incumbent on the poster to provide some facts on this.
__________________
Density Fanboy
Reply With Quote
  #229  
Old May 30, 2012, 10:03 PM
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 1
Default Fisgard

Also, I heard a while back that the Fisgard Bldg. was actually hit by an airplane in the very early days of flight - anybody know if there is truth to that? It is great that they are maintaining the facade of that building...
Reply With Quote
  #230  
Old May 31, 2012, 06:27 AM
The ESQ
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 729
Default

^ So random.
__________________
Predictive text and a tiny keyboard are not my friends!
Reply With Quote
  #231  
Old May 31, 2012, 11:04 AM
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 8,861
Default

I'm pretty sure the airplane crash is mentioned in "Victoria: Secrets of the City".

BC Archives:
http://www.bcarchives.gov.bc.ca/sn-1...42/g_05364.txt

Quote:
August 6, 1913 - The first fatal airplane accident in Canada occurred when John M. Bryant, husband of Alys (Tiny) Bryant, was killed in the crash of his plane at Victoria.
http://earlyaviators.com/ebryjohn.htm

Last edited by aastra; May 31, 2012 at 11:08 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #232  
Old May 31, 2012, 11:24 AM
Mike K.'s Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Vic West
Posts: 12,357
Default

Here's a photo. Certainly looks like a roof of a downtown building.

__________________
Skyscraper Source Media Inc.
Reply With Quote
  #233  
Old May 31, 2012, 11:37 AM
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Downtown Vic
Posts: 4
Default

I find it hard to believe that any site that has been active for over 100 years and used as a parking lot wouldn't have some sort of contamination.
Rather that contamination is a lot or minimum is another question.
I also seem to remember "rumors" (I know rumors are never a good thing) about contamination. Unfortunately though most newspaper and magazine archives I checked don't seem to go back more than 5 years.
However I did find this one bit from the Times Colonist referring to this site.

GREEN LIGHT ON FOR NEW HOTEL IN CHINATOWN by Cindy E. Harnett. Times - Colonist Victoria, B.C.:Sep 17, 2001. p. C1
"The permit was recommend for approval in accordance with four requirements which includes a permit from the province to begin excavation -- which will include remedial work to remove soil contamination on the site."

If there was contamination - perhaps it was already removed when excavation was originally started for the Bambu.
Reply With Quote
  #234  
Old May 31, 2012, 11:57 AM
G-Man's Avatar
Senior Case Officer
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: A hop, skip and a jump from Downtown.
Posts: 9,235
Default

The lot has been bare and fallow for many many years. I am finding it highly unlikely.
__________________
Density Fanboy
Reply With Quote
  #235  
Old May 31, 2012, 12:34 PM
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Downtown Vic
Posts: 4
Default

Well I guess we now know.

From the City Feb 2011

Scroll down to 4.4
https://victoria.civicweb.net/FileSt...Staff%20Re.pdf

From the BC Gov April 2011

https://victoria.civicweb.net/FileSt...MOE%20Appr.pdf
Reply With Quote
  #236  
Old May 31, 2012, 12:41 PM
Sparky's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: The Pen (insula)
Posts: 4,746
Default

Welcome to vibrant Victoria Kyjen. Can you help me out as to why you have an interest in the possible contamination?

Soil contamination topics remind me of soil that was removed to make way for Sangster School. Tests showed that there were minute traces of copper in the soil, so the engineers specified in the tender documents that it be trucked to the state of Washington to a location that specialized in this type of work.

One million dollars later it was determined that the copper was a natural componant of the soil.
Reply With Quote
  #237  
Old May 31, 2012, 02:02 PM
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Downtown Vic
Posts: 4
Default

Thanks for the welcome Sparky. Actually I have absolutely no care in the world about contamination on this site. I live in the area and I’m extremely thrilled that this site is finally getting developed.
I’ve been a lurker on this site for years and Love this site. I generally avoid signing up for chat sites as it prevents me from doing spontaneous response’s that after some thought may not be the best response. I’m one of those personalities that if you say up I’ll say down or you say black I’ll say white. However as I gracefully age I try to stick to the quote “everyone is allowed an opinion ….. however is it an informed opinion”.
Now true the original poster should have perhaps worded his comments about this site being contaminated better. But what got me going were the responses “Do you have proof that it is contaminated? If not I think your comment is defamatory of this project.” and “Yes I think it is incumbent on the poster to provide some facts on this.” So I did my first response since I too seem to remembered talk about the site in years past regarding contamination. I thought I responded in a way that was neither saying it was or wasn’t contaminated. Then came the response “The lot has been bare and fallow for many many years. I am finding it highly unlikely.” So my next post was simply to provide “an informed opinion” based on recent information.
I really hope I’m not getting off on the wrong foot with anybody … as I said earlier I really like this site and the many personalities/opinions found here. Cheers : )
Reply With Quote
  #238  
Old May 31, 2012, 02:06 PM
Sparky's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: The Pen (insula)
Posts: 4,746
Default

Thank you Kyjen, no worries. Well said.
Reply With Quote
  #239  
Old May 31, 2012, 07:41 PM
LJ LJ is online now
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Langford
Posts: 3,016
Default

removed
__________________
Life's a journey......so roll down the window and enjoy the breeze.
Reply With Quote
  #240  
Old May 31, 2012, 09:00 PM
Sparky's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: The Pen (insula)
Posts: 4,746
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LJ View Post
removed
Help me out LJ, what does that mean to the thread?
Reply With Quote
  #241  
Old May 31, 2012, 09:03 PM
G-Man's Avatar
Senior Case Officer
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: A hop, skip and a jump from Downtown.
Posts: 9,235
Default

I think it means he changed his mind.
__________________
Density Fanboy
Reply With Quote
  #242  
Old May 31, 2012, 09:14 PM
Sparky's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: The Pen (insula)
Posts: 4,746
Default

Thanks G-Man

By the way, you enlightened me with the story of the airplane crash into the building that may have been in the vicinity of the Union.

I had not heard that story before and I jumped to conclusions as to how that was possible so soon after the birth of flight so far away.

I was wrong. I owe you a beer the next time we meet.
Reply With Quote
  #243  
Old Jun 01, 2012, 11:00 AM
G-Man's Avatar
Senior Case Officer
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: A hop, skip and a jump from Downtown.
Posts: 9,235
Default

I will not argue with that. Though I will admit to being 4 years off in our discussion.
__________________
Density Fanboy
Reply With Quote
  #244  
Old Jun 01, 2012, 11:49 AM
gumgum's Avatar  
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Cook St. Village
Posts: 5,911
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MarkoJ View Post
Do you have proof that it is contaminated? If not I think your comment is defamatory of this project.
Just thought I'd offer my humble opinion regqrding this comment.

I interpret it as as bullying.

I read the statement regarding the soil as more of a question that is coming from someone that is not very knowledgeable about construction practices.

Can we please set aside the suggestion of lawsuits until we are absolutely certain someone is being defamatory? And I'm talking last resort.

We don't want people to feel intimidated to speak their minds, or to simply ask questions.
Reply With Quote
  #245  
Old Jun 01, 2012, 11:53 AM
MarkoJ's Avatar  
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Downtown
Posts: 1,127
Default

Currently there are 6 downtown projects competing for pre-sales.....a lot of potential purchasers are making their way onto Vibrant Victoria for guidance. What prevents someone (a competitor) from setting up an account and calling into question the feasibility of a project?
__________________
Marko Juras, REALTOR® & Associate Broker | Fair Realty
www.MarkoJuras.com - Gold MLS® Winner | www.FlatFeeListVictoria.com - List on MLS® for $799 | www.834sales.com - The 834 Specialist
Reply With Quote
  #246  
Old Jun 01, 2012, 12:05 PM
MarkoJ's Avatar  
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Downtown
Posts: 1,127
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gumgum View Post
Just thought I'd offer my humble opinion regqrding this comment.

I interpret it as as bullying.

I read the statement regarding the soil as more of a question that is coming from someone that is not very knowledgeable about construction practices.

Can we please set aside the suggestion of lawsuits until we are absolutely certain someone is being defamatory? And I'm talking last resort.

We don't want people to feel intimidated to speak their minds, or to simply ask questions.
PS. I do agree that the use of the word defamatory was probably a stretch on my part.
__________________
Marko Juras, REALTOR® & Associate Broker | Fair Realty
www.MarkoJuras.com - Gold MLS® Winner | www.FlatFeeListVictoria.com - List on MLS® for $799 | www.834sales.com - The 834 Specialist
Reply With Quote
  #247  
Old Jun 01, 2012, 07:28 PM
LJ LJ is online now
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Langford
Posts: 3,016
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by G-Man View Post
I think it means he changed his mind.
Exactly, I didn't realize that my question had been answered in a later post and there is no way I could delete the post.
__________________
Life's a journey......so roll down the window and enjoy the breeze.
Reply With Quote
  #248  
Old Jun 01, 2012, 07:48 PM
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 8,861
Default

More about the plane crash, from "Victoria: Secrets of the City" by Kevin Barefoot and the editors of Monday Magazine:

Quote:
In 1913, two of the best-known stunt pilots (or "barnstormers") around were Alys McKey and John Bryant, a wife-and-husband team from California. In August that year they travelled to Victoria to exhibit their skills at a festival of waterfront events...
Quote:
...her husband attached a float to the plane's undercarriage... and managed to pilot the plane over downtown -- becoming the first person to fly over a Canadian city -- and landed in the inner harbour, to the cheers of thousands.
Quote:
A few hours later, Bryant took off from the harbour, and circled back over downtown... the aircraft went into a steep dive over City Hall -- and, to the crowd's horror, crashed onto the roof of a building on Pandora Street, a few doors up from what is now the Swans Hotel.
Quote:
Bryant was killed instantly. Tragically, he'd set another record: he was the first person to die in a plane crash in Canada.
It's a really good book, just in case you've never checked it out:
http://www.amazon.com/Victoria-Secre.../dp/1551520850
Reply With Quote
  #249  
Old Jun 10, 2012, 07:39 PM
MarkoJ's Avatar  
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Downtown
Posts: 1,127
Default

June 10th, 2012.

__________________
Marko Juras, REALTOR® & Associate Broker | Fair Realty
www.MarkoJuras.com - Gold MLS® Winner | www.FlatFeeListVictoria.com - List on MLS® for $799 | www.834sales.com - The 834 Specialist
Reply With Quote
  #250  
Old Jun 30, 2012, 01:55 AM
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 906
Default

So they have dug down now what appears to be one level, and it looks like construction has begun as rebar and concrete are being put in place. One thing is for sure, this site is much larger than I appreciated when it was all fenced off and closed in.

It's odd seeing such a shallow excavation at a downtown construction site, but these buildings will have a large footprint and only be five floors tall so maybe only one level of parking is required. Anybody know?
Reply With Quote
You're not quite at the end of this discussion thread!

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page and read additional posts.
 

Reply

Go Back   VibrantVictoria.ca Discussion Forum > Victoria Construction and Land Development > City of Victoria



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
© Copyright 2006 - 2012, Skyscraper Source Media Inc.