VibrantVictoria.caVibrantVictoria: 2012 Winners of West Coast Social Media Awards' Community Builder Award


Welcome to VibrantVictoria.ca Construction Projects List Articles VibrantVictoria on Facebook VibrantVictoria on Twitter Register on VibrantVictoria's forum

Go Back   VibrantVictoria.ca Discussion Forum > Victoria Construction and Land Development > City of Victoria
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

    Union | Condo | 5- & 5-storeys

Construction Projects List Entry

Map of location

Aerial photo of location


Like Tree3Likes

Reply
 
Thread Link Options Thread Tools Display Modes
  #176  
Old Mar 04, 2012, 10:47 PM
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 590
Default

I think that part of the issue is the fact that Union is also competing in old town against the various LeFevre projects, which are all heritage renos with tonnes of character. The Oriental Hotel- even without parking- has had more sales success than Union or Kunju (601 Herald seems to be aimed at a slightly different market).
Reply With Quote
  #177  
Old Mar 05, 2012, 07:55 AM
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 8,804
Default

It is somewhat of a self-fulfilling prophecy. There's this idea that new buildings should "defer" to older buildings. That's not exactly a call for excellence.

I've said it before, this notion that all new buildings would embarrass all older buildings by default (because new buildings are awesome and older buildings suck) really doesn't demonstrate very much respect/admiration for older buildings.
Reply With Quote
  #178  
Old Mar 05, 2012, 08:12 AM
Mike K.'s Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Vic West
Posts: 12,068
Default

^I like the way you put that.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kapten Kapsell View Post
I think that part of the issue is the fact that Union is also competing in old town against the various LeFevre projects, which are all heritage renos with tonnes of character. The Oriental Hotel- even without parking- has had more sales success than Union or Kunju (601 Herald seems to be aimed at a slightly different market).
There could also be resistance from buyers over the future of the lot immediately across Fisgard (the giant parking lot). A building of equal height to Union would block almost every units views. Had Anthem expedited Union and started selling in 2010 this issue wouldn't have come up.

Kunju is now off the market. Not sure what happened there but marketing has ceased.
__________________
Skyscraper Source Media Inc.
Reply With Quote
  #179  
Old Mar 05, 2012, 09:25 AM
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 590
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aastra View Post
It is somewhat of a self-fulfilling prophecy. There's this idea that new buildings should "defer" to older buildings. That's not exactly a call for excellence.

I've said it before, this notion that all new buildings would embarrass all older buildings by default (because new buildings are awesome and older buildings suck) really doesn't demonstrate very much respect/admiration for older buildings.
I'm very much in favour of ultra-modern buildings going into Old Town; I think a building like SoMA (on Broughton next to Sussex Place) would work well in Old Town. My only point is that, from a marketing perspective, the Union is competing against similarly-priced suites that offer exposed-brick walls and 12-ft ceilings. Ideally the Union would offer some very modern design features (modular walls? Built-in storage units in unusual places?) in the unit interiors that would appeal to buyers shopping for a home in that area and to 'compete' against the heritage developments...
Reply With Quote
  #180  
Old Mar 17, 2012, 07:36 AM
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 4
Default

Hi guys, we are nearing mid March. Has anybody heard or seen any signs of construction startup?

Thanks I have enjoyed reading everyone's post on theory and concepts of design. Apologies for not having much to add.

Thank you,
M
Reply With Quote
  #181  
Old Mar 17, 2012, 09:29 AM
Mike K.'s Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Vic West
Posts: 12,068
Default

No signs of construction yet, but that could change any day.

Concorde usually has a good idea of what's happening behind the scenes but he hasn't made any updates about this project yet.
__________________
Skyscraper Source Media Inc.
Reply With Quote
  #182  
Old Mar 18, 2012, 02:13 PM
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 4
Default

Thanks Mike. Does anybody know what Prime Contractor has been named on the job or if one has been yet?
Reply With Quote
  #183  
Old Mar 19, 2012, 09:01 AM
Mike K.'s Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Vic West
Posts: 12,068
Default

No word yet. This doesn't bode well for the project, but who knows what's happening behind the scenes.
__________________
Skyscraper Source Media Inc.
Reply With Quote
  #184  
Old May 03, 2012, 12:30 PM
Mike K.'s Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Vic West
Posts: 12,068
Default

Ground-breaking on May 12th, 11AM - 1PM.
__________________
Skyscraper Source Media Inc.
Reply With Quote
  #185  
Old May 03, 2012, 01:01 PM
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 811
Default

Excellent news Mike.

As of last weekend they were still marketing so I assumed things were still underway.
Reply With Quote
  #186  
Old May 03, 2012, 01:47 PM
Mike K.'s Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Vic West
Posts: 12,068
Default

Great news, indeed. The project representative I spoke with says many buyers have been hesitant to purchase before construction began given the history of the site. Construction will change perceptions of the project and confirm Anthem's commitment to the site.

Quote:
Construction to start at Union project in Old Town
By Mike Kozakowski
http://vibrantvictoria.ca/local-news...t-in-old-town/

After more than a decade of failed proposals and stalled plans the infamous Buckerfield site bridging downtown Victoria’s Chinatown and Old Town districts is finally on its way to a complete transformation.

Union, a five-storey, two-building project spanning the 500-block of Pandora Avenue and Fisgard Street will break ground May 12th and mark the start of Anthem Properties’ first foray into Victoria’s new-build condo market.

Anthem’s Leah Jewell said the project is expected to take approximately 18 months to complete and will be ready for occupancy by the fall of 2013. [Read more]
__________________
Skyscraper Source Media Inc.
Reply With Quote
  #187  
Old May 03, 2012, 03:36 PM
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 410
Default

Yeah, you have to figure they'd have a much higher chance of making sales once people are more confident something will actually be built there.
Reply With Quote
  #188  
Old May 03, 2012, 03:57 PM
gumgum's Avatar  
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Cook St. Village
Posts: 5,884
Default

Thank god.
Reply With Quote
  #189  
Old May 04, 2012, 07:57 AM
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 5
Exclamation Regarding The Union development and its impact...

Vibrant. I hardly think so.Totally insenstive actually, and the End of an Era. Still can't believe they allowed an extra 12-14 feet to the height ( to match the height of existing storefronts ?-ie The Bean ?) as the impact and loss of natural light and sunshine for Everyone - working, and living in Chinatown, will be irrevocably and drastically reduced . No afternoon light on Fisgard for the 2/3rds of the year ! Hello gentrification ! Also of a lessor note , is their PR campaign promoting the development: very ironic they've appropriated images of the surrounding neighborhood , with the concept reiterated of its "union" to the area, as it will drawf the existing buidings to twice their height in most cases.Also by the by, this aspect of "Theatre Alley " connecting and allowing access to Fan Tan Alley is simply not true or possible: there is a property between Fan Tan Alley and the Union property : also our communal garden off Fan Tan Alley and actually in Theatre Alley, will have ALL of its direct sunlight entirely blocked when theit project is completed. Thanks alot !
Union - ? I hardly think so.......
Reply With Quote
  #190  
Old May 04, 2012, 08:06 AM
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 8,804
Default

I suppose that's another great thing about surface parking lots (or empty lots, as the case may be): they make an area much more cheery and bright.
Reply With Quote
  #191  
Old May 04, 2012, 08:12 AM
VicHockeyFan's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: On the edge (of downtown) but I'm knocking on the door
Posts: 15,075
Default

No afternoon light on Fisgard for 2/3 of the year?

Come on.

OK, you don't like the fact that building continues in Chinatown AFTER you moved there. But you don't need to exaggerate. I'm pretty sure that even in January you won't need a flashlight to make your way down Fisgard.

THIS is an aerial view of the property on a sunny day. Where are all its shadows going to go?
__________________
TALK about Downtown Victoria on FaceBook: I ❤ Downtown Victoria or TALK about Sidney on FaceBook: I ❤ Sidney

Last edited by VicHockeyFan; May 04, 2012 at 08:22 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #192  
Old May 04, 2012, 08:26 AM
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 8,804
Default

Checkout the shadow from the CRD building on the next block up:
http://binged.it/IB3phh

The CRD building is maybe a bit less than double the height of the Union, yes?
Reply With Quote
  #193  
Old May 04, 2012, 08:30 AM
Bob Fugger's Avatar  
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: South Central Cook Street Village
Posts: 2,192
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Allan E View Post
Vibrant. I hardly think so.Totally insenstive actually, and the End of an Era. Still can't believe they allowed an extra 12-14 feet to the height ( to match the height of existing storefronts ?-ie The Bean ?) as the impact and loss of natural light and sunshine for Everyone - working, and living in Chinatown, will be irrevocably and drastically reduced . No afternoon light on Fisgard for the 2/3rds of the year ! Hello gentrification ! Also of a lessor note , is their PR campaign promoting the development: very ironic they've appropriated images of the surrounding neighborhood , with the concept reiterated of its "union" to the area, as it will drawf the existing buidings to twice their height in most cases.Also by the by, this aspect of "Theatre Alley " connecting and allowing access to Fan Tan Alley is simply not true or possible: there is a property between Fan Tan Alley and the Union property : also our communal garden off Fan Tan Alley and actually in Theatre Alley, will have ALL of its direct sunlight entirely blocked when theit project is completed. Thanks alot !
Union - ? I hardly think so.......
Welcome to VV, Johnny NIMBYington.
Reply With Quote
  #194  
Old May 04, 2012, 08:44 AM
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 8,804
Default

Based on the shadowing from the CRD building (which is quite a bit taller than the Union), I think we can conclude that the shadowing from the Union will be a non-issue (note how I estimated the height of the Union based on the rendering and the height of the building next door... if anyone sees anything wrong with this, please advise):










So how exactly are they going to pull this off on such a deep lot? Has anyone ever seen an overhead view of the Union?

Edit: I suppose I should have checked their website before I asked the question:


picture from http://unionvictoria.com/design/shared-spaces/

Last edited by aastra; May 04, 2012 at 08:49 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #195  
Old May 04, 2012, 08:56 AM
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 8,804
Default

I don't know about you guys, but my only concerns about this one are the way it looks on the Fisgard side. It seems to be too horizontal. Methinks it would fit better in Chinatown if the windows were narrow and tall and if the brick exterior were painted in places.
Reply With Quote
  #196  
Old May 04, 2012, 11:23 AM
Mike K.'s Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Vic West
Posts: 12,068
Default

Quote:
Vibrant. I hardly think so.Totally insenstive actually, and the End of an Era. Still can't believe they allowed an extra 12-14 feet to the height ( to match the height of existing storefronts ?-ie The Bean ?) as the impact and loss of natural light and sunshine for Everyone - working, and living in Chinatown, will be irrevocably and drastically reduced.
I dunno, the previous proposal that fell through (called Bambu) was zoned for 7-floors (or was it a recessed 9?) and it would have been much more imposing than Union at five floors.

As for the blight that the current site is together with the blown out heritage facade (seriously, the appearance of that block makes it look like something out of 1970's Harlem) Union will no doubt be welcomed by most residents of the area and visitors to the city won't stare in bewilderment wondering whether or not they've stepped into a dodgy part of town.

Now if we could only do something about that annoying music pumping out of the Chinatown gate...
__________________
Skyscraper Source Media Inc.
Reply With Quote
  #197  
Old May 04, 2012, 12:09 PM
gumgum's Avatar  
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Cook St. Village
Posts: 5,884
Default

It's sad that people would find reason to hate something like this. It's not even worth wasting time responding to actually.
Reply With Quote
  #198  
Old May 04, 2012, 01:40 PM
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 811
Default

I agree gum gum. It's not even worth debating.

The status quo is terrible. It's like bombed out Bosnia. This location is important and this project is badly needed. There is no doubt in my mind that this development will bring life and vibrance to two of Victoria's most important streets in one of poor most important neighborhoods.

Arguing against a small building on this site is insane and the pinnacle of nimbyism. I look forward to watching this project progress.
Reply With Quote
  #199  
Old May 04, 2012, 03:37 PM
Nparker's Avatar  
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: on the edge of downtown
Posts: 3,292
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Allan E View Post
Thanks alot! Union - ? I hardly think so...
I wasn't going to respond, but your post is so asinine and symptomatic of much of what is wrong with our region that I just can't let it go unheeded. In a word, you sir, are wrong. Please go back under whatever rock from which you recently crawled and stay there.
Reply With Quote
  #200  
Old May 04, 2012, 04:05 PM
Holden West's Avatar
Va va voom!
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Please stand by
Posts: 7,852
Default

I know I'm asking too much but it would be nice if we could observe people coming here to state their objections without having to witness kindergarten namecalling from people who should know better.

Having said that, I don't agree with Allen's comments and I sure would like to know what his alternative to "gentrification" is.
__________________
"Beaver, ahoy!"
"The bridge is like a magnet, attracting both pedestrians and over 30,000 vehicles daily who enjoy the views of Victoria's harbour. The skyline may change, but "Big Blue" as some call it, will always be there."
-City of Victoria website, 2009
Reply With Quote
You're not quite at the end of this discussion thread!

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page and read additional posts.
 

Reply

Go Back   VibrantVictoria.ca Discussion Forum > Victoria Construction and Land Development > City of Victoria



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
© Copyright 2006 - 2012, Skyscraper Source Media Inc.