VibrantVictoria.caVibrantVictoria: 2012 Winners of West Coast Social Media Awards' Community Builder Award


Welcome to VibrantVictoria.ca Construction Projects List Articles VibrantVictoria on Facebook VibrantVictoria on Twitter Register on VibrantVictoria's forum

Go Back   VibrantVictoria.ca Discussion Forum > Victoria Construction and Land Development > City of Victoria
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read


Reply
 
Thread Link Options Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old Dec 18, 2011, 08:16 AM
G-Man's Avatar
Senior Case Officer
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: A hop, skip and a jump from Downtown.
Posts: 9,237
Under Construction Building [Quadra/Hillside] 2835 - 2855 Quadra Street - Quadra Villa Redevelopment

So once again the Hillside Community paper is talking up the new project for Quadra Villa.

Short version is plan to fix up old buildings and build new buildings over the parking lot. Sounds like townhouses off fifth street and two rental buildings on Quadra. Interesting to note that they are called "micro units" where each suite will have room for a bed kitchen and bathroom but no living space. That will be a separate space on each floor.

Here is what I have found online so far:http://www.victoria.ca/contentmanage...111013_bov.pdf
__________________
Density Fanboy
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old Dec 18, 2011, 08:20 AM
G-Man's Avatar
Senior Case Officer
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: A hop, skip and a jump from Downtown.
Posts: 9,237
Default

Nothing on the architects site yet...

http://ericbarkerarchitect.com/
__________________
Density Fanboy
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old Dec 18, 2011, 09:06 AM
Holden West's Avatar
Va va voom!
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Please stand by
Posts: 7,873
Default

As long as they keep the cheap, family-friendly units. Being close to shopping, schools and bus routes, they're irreplaceable. Eliminating superfluous parking and building more suites for singles is a bonus.
__________________
"Beaver, ahoy!"
"The bridge is like a magnet, attracting both pedestrians and over 30,000 vehicles daily who enjoy the views of Victoria's harbour. The skyline may change, but "Big Blue" as some call it, will always be there."
-City of Victoria website, 2009
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old Dec 18, 2011, 10:06 AM
amor de cosmos's Avatar
YIMBY
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,904
Default

I missed the part about building on the parking lot. All I saw was the part about the decks being replaced.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old Apr 26, 2012, 02:27 PM
VicHockeyFan's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: On the edge (of downtown) but I'm knocking on the door
Posts: 15,349
Default

Someone has sent letters to the media and the Mayor complaining about a "renoviction" in progress here. Eviction notices have gone out to all residents.

League Assets has responded.

They have tried to adhere to the tenancy act, and...

7 units will be non-market, to allow some existing tenants to move in.

They have made a $28k donation to someone for affordable housing.

They have asked tenants what they need ie. cash, relocation assistance etc. to help.


Ben Isitt is concerned, and wants to pass some type of motion at council asking the developer to allow some type of tenancy continuance through the whole thing, and no displacement of anyone that does not want to move.
__________________
TALK about Downtown Victoria on FaceBook: I ❤ Downtown Victoria or TALK about Sidney on FaceBook: I ❤ Sidney

Last edited by VicHockeyFan; Apr 26, 2012 at 02:30 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old Apr 26, 2012, 08:02 PM
G-Man's Avatar
Senior Case Officer
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: A hop, skip and a jump from Downtown.
Posts: 9,237
Default

Please the owner is within their rights and anyone can see the place is falling apart.
__________________
Density Fanboy
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old Apr 27, 2012, 07:40 AM
Mike K.'s Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Vic West
Posts: 12,369
Default

It's not council's job to get involved with motions that prohibit displacement of anyone who doesn't want to move. Pushing this on the landowner would lend itself to yet another costly legal suit against the City for which tax payers would be on the hook.
__________________
Skyscraper Source Media Inc.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old Apr 27, 2012, 07:50 AM
VicHockeyFan's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: On the edge (of downtown) but I'm knocking on the door
Posts: 15,349
Default

This council is famous for getting involved in things that are outside of municipal mandates. Why would they stop at this?

Isitt says he wants the developer to work with the city to find low-cost solutions. I sense a tug at my wallet to pay for someone else's housing.
__________________
TALK about Downtown Victoria on FaceBook: I ❤ Downtown Victoria or TALK about Sidney on FaceBook: I ❤ Sidney

Last edited by VicHockeyFan; Apr 27, 2012 at 08:02 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old Apr 28, 2012, 08:29 AM
VicHockeyFan's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: On the edge (of downtown) but I'm knocking on the door
Posts: 15,349
Default

Look, here's the fact. These units are going to rent for much higher prices when the remediation is complete. So I don't see how staggering evictions is going to help.

http://www.timescolonist.com/busines...121/story.html

This is interesting:

Quote:
“There’s a historically high vacancy rate and part of our thinking was to time it so we could take advantage of the rental market,” he said.

Canada Mortgage and Housing Corp. puts the vacancy rate in Greater Victoria at 2.1 per cent, but Rob Hunter of Devon Properties, to which tenants are being referred, said he believes the real vacancy rate is between six and seven per cent.
That's quite a gap between the two opinions.

CMHC says we have 23,500 apartment units in dedicated apartments of 3 units or more. That is 1142 structures.

And then there of course is all kinds of basement suites and individual condominium units rented that CMHC does not track.

But even at the 2% vacancy rate, the lowest possible opinion, it means there are 470 units available for these 60 displaced tenants. And at the high end, 7% means there are 1600 units available.
__________________
TALK about Downtown Victoria on FaceBook: I ❤ Downtown Victoria or TALK about Sidney on FaceBook: I ❤ Sidney

Last edited by VicHockeyFan; Apr 28, 2012 at 08:31 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old Apr 28, 2012, 10:02 AM
Nparker's Avatar  
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: on the edge of downtown
Posts: 3,292
Default

Bottom line: Victoria city council needs to keep their collective, social-engineering nose out of this sort of business.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old Apr 28, 2012, 06:23 PM
phx phx is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Mt. Tolmie
Posts: 1,042
Default

That'll be hard; that kind of deal is what politicians live for.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old Jun 05, 2012, 12:49 AM
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 19
Default

I just found out about this project tonight. Renovictions are largely complete. The representative for the developer, League Assets, said that some extra help was given to those moving out, beyond what the tenancy act requires, especially to the more dire straits/hard to house tenants. It sucks for those losing a cheap place to live, but this way the rental units will stay rental after full renovations to bring all suites up to a basic standard. A few suites will probably be st aside for low income families. -And they can screen tenants, who moves in, or back in(!) City hall has refused to accept the application until some revisions to the plan are made. It would be cool if the city gave the go ahead to the renovations part easily right off the bat and then they could hassle about stuff like zoning for different parts of the new part and parking requirements while the renovations were going on.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old Jun 05, 2012, 06:25 AM
G-Man's Avatar
Senior Case Officer
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: A hop, skip and a jump from Downtown.
Posts: 9,237
Default

^ Do you know what the city hall has asked to be changed?

This place is currently an eyesore and can only assume that the inner workings of the structures is even worse. It is best for both the city and the residents that this place be fixed though I would have preferred a full tear down.
__________________
Density Fanboy
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old Jun 07, 2012, 06:23 PM
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 19
Default

I don't know why the plans were rejected for revision. Maybe the city planning staff were not at liberty to say at this point, since the official process hasn't even started yet?
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old Jul 25, 2012, 07:08 AM
VicHockeyFan's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: On the edge (of downtown) but I'm knocking on the door
Posts: 15,349
Default

Looking at the pic in today's TC, maybe they can make these look like "Malibu-style" walk-ups. At least in the summer. They have kinda a neat roof overhang, and they could do a killer landscaping job, as they start from scratch now between the units.

I wonder what the exterior finishes and balconies are going to be...
__________________
TALK about Downtown Victoria on FaceBook: I ❤ Downtown Victoria or TALK about Sidney on FaceBook: I ❤ Sidney
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old Aug 21, 2012, 11:29 PM
Rob Randall's Avatar  
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Gordon Head
Posts: 2,471
Default

They're already installing windows so it looks like the exterior is getting a relatively minor facelift. Don't know if the arched brick decorations G-Man loves will remain

I was amused to see a worker take off his respirator--to have a cigarette.
__________________
Robert Randall's blog
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old Aug 22, 2012, 06:28 AM
G-Man's Avatar
Senior Case Officer
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: A hop, skip and a jump from Downtown.
Posts: 9,237
Default

Yeah it looks like a pretty minor update to me. Oh well. The buildings don't even look level to me.
__________________
Density Fanboy
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old Feb 14, 2013, 10:51 AM
G-Man's Avatar
Senior Case Officer
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: A hop, skip and a jump from Downtown.
Posts: 9,237
Default

So I walk by this site every day and it has to be the most bizarrely organized project I have ever seen. I would love to see the GANTT chart.

This is the order I have seen things done:

Remove windows
Replace windows
Dig a lot around the whole site
Build weird modern structures around the site some in line with doors others not
build decks
build concrete walkways

What has not been done yet:

Do anything about exterior ornamentation or stucco (including old weird brick archways)
Remove satellite dishes from previous owners
Remove old security lighting
Roofing

The new concrete is already scratched up as work has had to continue around it. I have no idea how they are going to fix up the exterior in anyway besides just paint with the windows in already.
__________________
Density Fanboy
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old Feb 14, 2013, 11:06 AM
Dylan Leblanc's Avatar
Custom User Title
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Downtown
Posts: 2,950
Default

I wonder what the expected life span of these buildings will be now that they are renovated. It would be really nice to see them and the parking lot replaced completely one day.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old Feb 14, 2013, 07:05 PM
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 117
Default

It doesn't fill one with confidence that this wasn't just a renoviction move to up rents.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old Apr 21, 2013, 01:00 PM
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 22
Default

Have been working in the Quadra Village for a bit now. The project is a complete disaster. NOTHING is being done to improve the interior or exterior of any of the units. A complete patchwork to raise the rents from the $800 they were to $1200 when complete. There is basically 8 blocks of 8 2 bedroom units each. One block on the Fifth Street side has separated from the others and sank into the ground. From one end to the other this block is 14 inches out of level. Nothing is being done to repair or replace these units!!
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old Apr 21, 2013, 01:05 PM
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 22
Default

[IMG][/img]
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old Apr 21, 2013, 01:09 PM
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 22
Default

[IMG][/img]
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old Apr 21, 2013, 01:11 PM
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 22
Default

[IMG][/img]
Reply With Quote
 

Reply

Go Back   VibrantVictoria.ca Discussion Forum > Victoria Construction and Land Development > City of Victoria



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
© Copyright 2006 - 2012, Skyscraper Source Media Inc.