VibrantVictoria.caVibrantVictoria: 2012 Winners of West Coast Social Media Awards' Community Builder Award


Welcome to VibrantVictoria.ca Construction Projects List Articles VibrantVictoria on Facebook VibrantVictoria on Twitter Register on VibrantVictoria's forum

Go Back   VibrantVictoria.ca Discussion Forum > Food, Dining and Hospitality > Food & Dining General Discussion
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read


Reply
 
Thread Link Options Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old Nov 15, 2009, 09:56 PM
sebberry's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 7,005
Default Food, Inc. (The documentary)

Just watched this documentary. Just enough detail to really give you a good insight into how commercialized the fresh food production, especially meat, has become.

I would say that most of us on here are concerned about social and environmental issues and I recommend that you rent and watch this.
__________________
Is your password secure enough? Check here!
Information on fair copyright and online privacy
Road safety through education, not speed enforcement
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old Nov 15, 2009, 10:07 PM
martini's Avatar  
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: omnipresent
Posts: 2,264
Default

I have been meaning to see this, my understanding is it's a 'must see'.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old Nov 15, 2009, 10:17 PM
VicHockeyFan's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: On the edge (of downtown) but I'm knocking on the door
Posts: 15,080
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sebberry View Post
Just enough detail to really give you a good insight into how commercialized the fresh food production, especially meat, has become.
I think food production has always been "commercial", it has just become more industrial with much greater economies of scale over the last 40 years. That makes it LESS EXPENSIVE, and that's how most people make choices between products they know little else about, they make it based on price.

I'm not sure what you mean about "fresh food production" either. That cut of steak or chicken thigh is more or less prepared the same way it was by a 1920's butcher, although the animal is raised very differently.

One big difference is that they find ways to use animal by-products for other food items, in produced, processed, packaged food. Some of it is very ingenious. It's a bit like that barrel of crude oil, by the time you refine it, you end up using a bit of it for kerosene, some for paint thinners, some for deisel fuel, some for plastics and chemicals, and some for gasoline and jet fuel. Just think of that pig or cow or chicken as a barrel of crude oil, ripe for processing.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old Nov 15, 2009, 10:42 PM
martini's Avatar  
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: omnipresent
Posts: 2,264
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VicHockeyFan View Post
I'm not sure what you mean about "fresh food production" either. That cut of steak or chicken thigh is more or less prepared the same way it was by a 1920's butcher, although the animal is raised very differently.
I think that would depend on the meat product you were consuming.
The local butcher is almost a bygone entity. Enter the meat processing plants.
Even at the local supermarkets...the butcher saw is gone and most meat is prepackaged on the mainland.
There is a vast difference between Canada and the U.S. as well as far as meat is concerned.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old Nov 16, 2009, 03:01 PM
sebberry's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 7,005
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VicHockeyFan View Post
I think food production has always been "commercial", it has just become more industrial with much greater economies of scale over the last 40 years. That makes it LESS EXPENSIVE, and that's how most people make choices between products they know little else about, they make it based on price.

I'm not sure what you mean about "fresh food production" either. That cut of steak or chicken thigh is more or less prepared the same way it was by a 1920's butcher, although the animal is raised very differently.

One big difference is that they find ways to use animal by-products for other food items, in produced, processed, packaged food. Some of it is very ingenious. It's a bit like that barrel of crude oil, by the time you refine it, you end up using a bit of it for kerosene, some for paint thinners, some for deisel fuel, some for plastics and chemicals, and some for gasoline and jet fuel. Just think of that pig or cow or chicken as a barrel of crude oil, ripe for processing.
You're right, part of it is about how the animals are treated differently. How about corn fed cows that raises the rates of e-coli and ammonia cleansed chicken to be used as fillers for other meat food items?

It isn't purely about the food, either. Awful animal treatment, awful plant worker treatment, etc..
__________________
Is your password secure enough? Check here!
Information on fair copyright and online privacy
Road safety through education, not speed enforcement
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old Nov 16, 2009, 03:03 PM
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Victoriahhhh
Posts: 544
Default

Quote:
Just think of that pig or cow or chicken as a barrel of crude oil, ripe for processing.
Ironic that you should say that... according to National Geographic, it takes ~ 3/4 of a barrel of oil to raise a pound of beef in the USA http://environment.nationalgeographi...ilforbeef.html
__________________
Say, what's that mountain goat doing up here in the mist?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old Nov 16, 2009, 03:17 PM
VicHockeyFan's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: On the edge (of downtown) but I'm knocking on the door
Posts: 15,080
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by North Shore View Post
Ironic that you should say that... according to National Geographic, it takes ~ 3/4 of a barrel of oil to raise a pound of beef in the USA http://environment.nationalgeographi...ilforbeef.html
I read that it takes something like 33 L of water to make one L of Coca Cola. Crazy stuff.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old Nov 16, 2009, 07:44 PM
phx phx is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Mt. Tolmie
Posts: 1,040
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by North Shore View Post
Ironic that you should say that... according to National Geographic, it takes ~ 3/4 of a barrel of oil to raise a pound of beef in the USA http://environment.nationalgeographi...ilforbeef.html
Er, it's 3/4 of gallon, not barrel, per pound.
Reply With Quote
 

Reply

Go Back   VibrantVictoria.ca Discussion Forum > Food, Dining and Hospitality > Food & Dining General Discussion



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
© Copyright 2006 - 2012, Skyscraper Source Media Inc.