VibrantVictoria.caVibrantVictoria: 2012 Winners of West Coast Social Media Awards' Community Builder Award


Welcome to VibrantVictoria.ca Construction Projects List Articles VibrantVictoria on Facebook VibrantVictoria on Twitter Register on VibrantVictoria's forum

Go Back   VibrantVictoria.ca Discussion Forum > Urban Issues > Heritage
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read


Reply
 
Thread Link Options Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old Jun 09, 2010, 10:05 AM
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Victoria BC
Posts: 3,588
Default Lighthouses of BC

Surplus Lighthouses

The federal government has announced that 976 unmanned light houses across the country are surplus, and could be replaced with simpler structures.

The beacon on the end of the Ogden Point breakwater is one that could be replaced.

The Department of Fisheries and Oceans acknowledge the heritage value of such structures and says individuals, municipalities or non-profit groups can protect them by seeking heritage designation through Parks Canada.

Hertitage designation would be a smart approach for the Ogden Point light before another iconic piece of Victoria gets replaced.

http://www.timescolonist.com/news/un...283/story.html
__________________
"I know nothing except the fact of my ignorance" - Socrates
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old Jun 09, 2010, 01:59 PM
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: tweed curtain (behind)
Posts: 1,280
Default

Many of them are graceful and loaded with character and stories, they help define our coasts and bring some romanticism to a desperately unromantic country.
They'll be replaced by generic ugly steel towers with a computer box inside.
And so one more piece of our heritage is dumped to save pennies.
Meanwhile $1 billion or more is pissed away on a 3-day party for windbags and their planeloads of arselickers.
Feh!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old Jun 09, 2010, 03:16 PM
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,924
Default

A billion dollar boondoggle.
An artificial lake with canoes, trees, deck chairs and a fake dock, this may be the last straw. For heaven's sake, the meeting isn't a spectator sport.

Lose the lake, save the lighthouses.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old Jun 09, 2010, 03:48 PM
VicHockeyFan's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: On the edge (of downtown) but I'm knocking on the door
Posts: 15,089
Default

Yah, they ought to can the lighthouses. Tourism groups or preservationists or the like can take over the best few of them. Sounds reasonable.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old Dec 21, 2010, 09:52 AM
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Victoria BC
Posts: 3,588
Default

Senate committee recommends lighthouse staffing be maintained for now. - OTTAWA

"A Senate committee that travelled to two provinces to study lighthouse operations in the country is recommending Ottawa continue staffing the facilities for now.

The committee says the Department of Fisheries should halt its lighthouse destaffing plan and suggests future staffing decisions should be made on a case-by-case basis.

It says guidelines and consultations are needed to determine whether keepers should be maintained in Newfoundland and Labrador and British Columbia.

Senator Bill Rompkey, chair of the committee, says they were unanimously recommending continued staffing after hearing overwhelming support for lighthouse personnel on both coasts.

The committee also recommends a comprehensive cost-benefit analysis be done on the full range of services provided by staffed lighthouses.
Fisheries Minister Gail Shea announced the review and stalled plans to remove lighthouse keepers amid fierce criticism last year, as some argued the move would cost lives at sea".

Oh holy night, they have seen the light.

http://home.mytelus.com/telusen/port...CatID=National
__________________
"I know nothing except the fact of my ignorance" - Socrates
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old Dec 21, 2010, 06:07 PM
Bernard's Avatar  
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Victoria - Burnside Tillicum neighbourhood
Posts: 3,284
Default

All the arguments for keeping the lighthouses have to do with roles the lightkeepers are not responsible for. If the coast watch is an important thing, then there should be some other way that it gets paid for and no pretend that these roles make it worth keeping lightkeepers on staff
Reply With Quote
 

Reply

Go Back   VibrantVictoria.ca Discussion Forum > Urban Issues > Heritage



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
© Copyright 2006 - 2012, Skyscraper Source Media Inc.