The problem here is that someone at City Hall is under the false impression that they are working at a for profit business. If necessary revenues are down there needs to be some cost savings somewhere. The hiring blitz /explosion of management posts is insane unless you are a business that plans on making money from the work those new hires are going to do. Unless their business development plan is based around increasing the size of the tax base rather than the tax rates, their plans are going to do nothing but drive businesses are residents out of Victoria.
This is simple. Water costs at CRD are relatively fixed and due to conservation, revenue has declined.
Kinda crazy, as they've been telling us to conserve to save money. Conservation may reduce costs down the road, but probably not by much.
Personally, I think the water billing is fine, but a 2 tier water billing system suggested in the other thread is a great idea.
Sewer costs are separate. As posted in the other thread and here
http://www.victoria....s_crdbll.shtml:Sewer charges are now tied to water usage and
CRD sewer costs will no longer be levied on the property tax bill.
If you don't like it now, wait till next year when it goes up again.
And then we can all look forward to when sewage treatment costs really get going.....
This change is due to the anticipated costs associated with secondary sewage treatment mandated for the Capital Region. With the full implementation of the CRD's Liquid Waste Management Plan (to introduce secondary sewage treatment) the cost to the citizens and businesses in Victoria is expected to be significant. In the next 10 years it is estimated the City of Victoria share of these CRD sewer costs will increase from $5.2 million in 2009 up to $27.9 million in 2017.
So the sewer billing shift seems to me like a PR thing. The city distancing itself from the CRD's rising bills.